
The War with
Scotland 1482
King Edward had signed a treaty with Scotland
in 1474 and relations between the two countries had been amicable, with
the king paying instalments on his daughter Cecily’s dowry in preparation
for her marriage to the Scottish heir.
By the late 1470s, however, the Scots began breaking the truce
and once again the border country was the subject of raids and pillaging.
European politics may have been at the root of the problem. France and
Burgundy were at odds and Louis XI of France may have encouraged James
III of Scotland to renew the auld alliance with his country.
If Scotland breached their treaty with England and Edward had to concern
himself with his northern border, Louis could hope that the English
king would not become too interested in what was happening on the continent.
Edward’s response to the Scottish aggression
was to send Alexander Legh to demand reparation, and, if this was not
agreed, to threaten James III with war. However, Edward would be satisfied
if the Scottish heir was handed over to the English to guarantee the
marriage with Cecily and that Berwick was restored to England. James
III refused on both counts and the English began preparations for war.
On 12 May 1480 Richard of Gloucester was appointed lieutenant-general,
and in June commissions of array were issued in three of the northern
counties. James became nervous at this point and made overtures to the
English but these were rejected and in November Edward announced he
intended to prosecute the war personally the following year.
In the late
spring of 1481 John Lord Howard sailed into the Firth of
Forth destroying and capturing Scottish ships and burning Blackness.
Richard of Gloucester had in the meantime recruited men to the border
garrisons and worked closely with the earl of Northumberland to establish
how many men could be called upon for the invasion.
Richard, along with the Scottish renegade earl of Douglas, was
also given the task of suborning key Scottish lords to weaken King James’s
support, but this covert activity met with little success. In March
Richard had visited London to discuss the invasion plans but was no
doubt dismayed later in the year to learn that the king had decided
not to undertake the campaign himself because of ‘adverse turmoil’ and
left Richard and Northumberland ‘to wage a vigorous war against the
Scots’ (Scofield II, p. 321). King
Edward did travel as far as Nottingham where he arrived on 1 October
and stayed until the 20th. Richard
met him there, and it was no doubt agreed that it was too late in the
season for the full invasion to take place that year. In Richard’s absence from the immediate vicinity
of the war Northumberland may have appealed to the citizens of York
for men in a letter dated 13 October when he reported the Scots were
already in his eponymous county. The
year of the letter is uncertain (Kendall attributed it to 1480) but
the incident may well be the one recorded by the Scottish historian
John Leslie that the ‘borderers invaded the marches of England and took
away many preys of goods and destroyed many towns and led many persons
in Scotland’. Following the
fresh news of Scottish incursions into England Richard returned to the
front, laid siege to the town and citadel of Berwick, which he failed
to take, and was no doubt involved in the ‘intermittent warfare [that]
continued all along the border during the winter’ (Ross, p. 282).
The new year brought a new campaigning season and on 21 February
Richard received a commission to obtain the necessary victuals for his
army, with leave to find them anywhere in England, Wales and Ireland. The harvest had been poor, hence the permission to find grain and
crops wherever they were available.
On 22 May Richard led an attack into southwest Scotland and reached
Dumfries which he burned amongst other towns.
Events now took an unexpected turn when the brother of James
III, the duke of Albany, arrived in England from France where he had
been living since fleeing Scotland in 1479. King Edward welcomed the
Scottish traitor and during a stay at Fotheringhay, where they were
joined by Richard, a treaty was agreed on 11 June, in which the English
king recognised Albany’s claim to the throne of Scotland.
The following day Richard was confirmed as Lieutenant-General
of the North and with Albany set out on the invasion of Scotland.
He had authority to raise an army of around 20,000 men and sufficient
funds to pay them for four weeks. The
muster was complete by mid-July and the army crossed the border. The
English host was large enough to terrify Berwick and the town fell to
Richard without further delay, although the citadel held out.
Lord Stanley was left to continue the siege whilst Richard moved
north, devastating Roxburghshire and Berwickshire, all the while expecting
to meet the Scottish army. He was to be disappointed. On 22 July King James’s dissatisfied subjects
had taken their king prisoner at Lauder, executed his favourites and
returned with their royal prisoner to Edinburgh. As Richard moved towards the capital the rebels moved to Haddington,
situated fifteen miles to the east, and awaited developments. Richard
found himself entering an undefended Scottish capital. He controlled
his army and the city was not molested. The king’s captors were prepared
to negotiate with Richard. Albany
immediately abandoned his hope of becoming king and settled for the
restoration of his lands and position. The Scots asked for a peace treaty
and that the proposed marriage between the Scottish heir and Cecily
take place. Richard demanded the return of Berwick Castle and the dowry
paid for the princess. The settlement was that the marriage would
go ahead if it were Edward’s wish, otherwise the dowry would be repaid.
Richard left Edinburgh, disbanded most of his army at Berwick on 11
August, and continued with the siege.
The castle fell on 24 August and has been part of England ever
since.
The Crowland
Chronicler was dismissive of the campaign – that it cost too much for
too little gain and that King Edward was grieved at the ‘frivolous expenditure’. It
is, however, difficult to see what other outcome there could have been. Richard, on the ground, would have appreciated
the mood of the Scots and that it would not be possible to establish
Albany on the throne, although the situation might have been different
if the Scottish army had been vanquished. In any event, this was not one of the original aims of the war.
Richard himself was also keenly aware of the cost of the army and that
he could not afford to prolong the negotiations or his stay in Scotland.
Suggested reading:
Edward IV by Charles Ross,
London 1974
James III: A Political Study
by Norman Macdougall, Edinburgh 1982
Richard the Third by
Paul Murray Kendall, London 1955
The Life and Reign of Edward the Fourth by Cora L Scofield, 2 vols, London 1924, reprinted 1967