|
A
good lawmaker for the ease and solace of the common people,' wrote Lord
Chancellor Sir Francis Bacon of Richard III; Bacon was a man who knew
his acts of parliament. The high percentage of acts passed by Richard's
parliament that tried to improve conditions for ordinary people reveals
the reason for Bacon's good opinion. Richard III's only parliament was
opened 23 January 1484, having been postponed from 6 November 1483 as
a result of Buckingham's rebellion. It was opened by a speech from Chancellor
Russell on the theme of peace; several versions of this speech survive,
the first clearly made when Edward V was still king and Richard of Gloucester
protector; that is, Russell had prepared it for the first parliament which
Edward would hold. The main matters before the assembly in 1484 were the
ratification of the new king's title, which was accomplished by the act
which is known as the Titulus regius, and the attainder of the
rebels with the formal forfeiture and seizure of their lands into the
king's hands. The king also needed money as he had been ruling for half
a year and put down a rebellion without any special grant from parliament
or enjoyment of the usual customs duties on goods going out or coming
into the realm which were granted to each king in his first parliament.
This financial situation was acknowledged by the unprecedented grant to
Richard of the customs for his life in his first parliament. Apart from
these all important acts there were twenty-one private acts, that is acts
which benefited particular individuals such as Lord Lovell, or settled
the descent of particular lands such as those of the duchy of Exeter.
Other
acts concerned the cloth industry and the office of aulnager (cap.
8), ordered that ten bowstaves were to be imported with every butt of
malmesey wine (cap. 11), decreed the size of butts for wine and oil (cap.
13), protected collectors of taxes on the clergy in the court of the exchequer
(cap. 14). These were useful and all promoted by the men involved. Anti-alien
acts were persistent features of medieval parliaments and especially promoted
by the citizens of London, a city with a history of anti-alien riots and
a substantial number of alien residents. Italian merchants and alien artisans
were the main targets. Richard's parliament re-enacted two anti-alien
acts of Edward IV’s first parliament and one new act that prohibited the
import of a wide variety of small manufactured goods, ordered alien merchants
to spend the profits of their sales on English goods, and limited aliens'
right to take non-English apprentices (cap. 9). This act was undoubtedly
almost as popular with Londoners as the anti-benevolence act; partly a
reward for London's assistance during Richard's accession. The Italians
immediately entered negotiations to overturn the clauses hostile to them,
while prosecution under other clauses always depended on the energy of
locals. The conspicuous proviso to this legislation was that the book-trade
and its artisans should not be affected in any way -- education and learning
was protected. Although not mentioned specifically, printing was protected
-- the new skill was well established in England by this time, notably
in London, and it is probable that Richard's statutes were the first to
be printed, and books printed abroad (in Latin and French) were already
flooding into the country. Undoubtedly there were many clerics on the
king's council who would have supported this proviso, and Richard's own
surviving books testify to his interest.
H.G. Hanbury 'The legislation of Richard III', American Journal of Legal History, vol. 6 (1962). Historically naive. A.F. Sutton, '"The administration of justice wherunto we be professed"', The Ricardian, vol. 4 (1976), repr. Richard III, Crown and People, London 1985, pp. 363-65. C. Ross, Richard III, London 1981, pp. 184-89. Weak on legal matters. A.F. Sutton, '"A curious searcher for our weal public": Richard III, piety, chivalry and the concept of the "good prince"' in Richard III: Loyalty, Lordship and Law, ed P.W. Hammond, repr. London 2000, pp. 97-99. Russell's speech: S.B. Chrimes, English Constitutional Ideas in the Fifteenth Century, Cambridge 1936, pp. 167-91. Fine: C.A.F. Meekings, Final Concords, Surrey Record Society 1946, pp. xxvi-vii. Use: J.W. Bean, The Decline of English Feudalism 1215-1540, Manchester 1968, pp. 177-78. |